User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million pieces of person
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Data must stay in China to get classified protection under Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
▪ Civil Fraud v. Criminal Fraud: Criminal Proceedings Not a Silver Bullet to Resolve
▪ Corrupt Chinese drug administrators jailed or executed, whose family members ended
▪ Tone from the middle cannot be ignored
▪ Is bribing a Chinese doctor bribing an FCPA governmental official?
▪ Criminal and Administrative Liability under China's Competition Laws
▪ Model Standards for Trade Association Compliance with China's AML
▪ Double Exposure to Legal Risk Under China's Competition Laws: Comments Upon the Ex
▪ New Privacy Standards for New Data
▪ Chinese Police Are Foxhunting Corrupt Officials
▪ Transfer of Personal Data Overseas from Singapore: Recent Enhanced Provisions
▪ New Guidance on Antitrust Notifications in China
▪ China Issued the Standards on the Quality Management of Using Medical Devices (Dra
▪ China Imposes Harsher Liabilities for Environmental Non-Compliance
▪ GSK Faces Two Corruption Fights in East and West
▪ European Court of Justice Abrogates Data Retention and Allows Data Detention
▪ China Is to Adopt Risk-based Supervisory Rules on Medical Devices
▪ China to Set Food & Drug Police
▪ Don't Put All Medical Eggs into One Blacklisted Basket
 
In China criminal legal system, there is the exclusion rule of illegally obtained evidence.  However, there is great room for improvement to enforce the Exclusionary Rule in China as evidenced in the case against Xie Yalong, former vice-chairman of the Chinese Football Association, and the director of the Chinese Football Management Centre.

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
The Data and Operation Director of the Greater China of D&B (Hong Kong) – Mr. Yuan who is a Hong Kong citizen was arrested as well for the crime of “illegally obtaining private information from Chinese citizens.”  Although an integral part of China politically and from the perspective of territory, Hong Kong is a non-Chinese jurisdiction in legal system.  Therefore, Mr. Yuan is an “emperor” not less foreign than from the U.S. or Europe.

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

Probably on the basis of the “optimistic” opinion of the lawyer, a board decision was adopted by Roadway (a subsidiary company of D&B in China) to continuously purchase the privacy data, and the board decision becomes a perfect incriminating evidence to prove the Roadway and the other four accused individuals intentionally committed the crime of breaching privacy.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
MOFCOM and SASAC are going to jointly work with the National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFPC) and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) to establish and streamline the creditability system of the whole pharmaceutical industry, by which bad records on pharmaceutical enterprises will be collected and archived.

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
It has been just over a month since the launch of the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone (FTZ) on 29 September 2013. The importance of the FTZ lies not only in the investment opportunities that have been opened, but because China has expressly indicated that reforms successful in the FTZ will be rolled out to other parts of China. The initial pilot period of the Shanghai FTZ is three years.

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

In the evening of October 23, 2013, GSK issued its third-quarter financial report, which indicated that the sales of its key drugs (i.e., prescription medicines and bacterin) dropped by 61% in China.  This is another bad news followed by a rumor of last month: Chinese government might penalize GSK with a fine of RMB 20 billion (i.e., US$ 3.33 billion) – three times more than the annual revenue of GSK in China in the last year. 



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
With the increased requirements of various companies and enterprises for compliance, “Compliance in China” (www.ComplianceinChina.com or www.compliance.com.cn) launched an Internet survey titled “What Are Your Compliance Requirements” on April 14, 2013 among its members – the members are mostly multinational and domestic companies with obvious requirements for compliance.  By October 27, 2013, there were 44 persons participating in the survey, hereinafter is the summary of the survey result:

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
PAGE TOTAL 87
11
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8

31010502002477