User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million pieces of person
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Data must stay in China to get classified protection under Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
▪ Civil Fraud v. Criminal Fraud: Criminal Proceedings Not a Silver Bullet to Resolve
▪ Corrupt Chinese drug administrators jailed or executed, whose family members ended
▪ Tone from the middle cannot be ignored
▪ Is bribing a Chinese doctor bribing an FCPA governmental official?
▪ Criminal and Administrative Liability under China's Competition Laws
▪ Model Standards for Trade Association Compliance with China's AML
▪ Double Exposure to Legal Risk Under China's Competition Laws: Comments Upon the Ex
▪ New Privacy Standards for New Data
▪ Chinese Police Are Foxhunting Corrupt Officials
▪ Transfer of Personal Data Overseas from Singapore: Recent Enhanced Provisions
▪ New Guidance on Antitrust Notifications in China
▪ China Issued the Standards on the Quality Management of Using Medical Devices (Dra
▪ China Imposes Harsher Liabilities for Environmental Non-Compliance
▪ GSK Faces Two Corruption Fights in East and West
▪ European Court of Justice Abrogates Data Retention and Allows Data Detention
▪ China Is to Adopt Risk-based Supervisory Rules on Medical Devices
▪ China to Set Food & Drug Police
▪ Don't Put All Medical Eggs into One Blacklisted Basket
 

In January 2010, 15 of the 16 Liuzhou factories entered into a collusion agreement with Xian Yi Ge Food Factory to raise the price of rice powder, and Xian Yi Ge adopted carrot-and-stick measures to make sure the agreement would be executed.  As a result of the agreement, the colluding rice powder factories issued notice of a 25 percent-plus price increase to downstream business operators, including rice powder wholesalers, retailers, rice powder food peddlers and stores.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

Trade or industry associations bring substantial benefits to their members and enhance competition in the economic sectors they represent.  However, member activities can also create major antitrust risks that are subject to aggressive enforcement and penalties under China’s Antimonopoly Law (AML).  This article shows how associations and their members can manage these risks through a compliance program that defines acceptable and prohibited activities. 



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
An "exclusive sales arrangement" in this article, is defined as an arrangement where a seller/trader provides a certain economic benefit to its counterparty in exchange for the counterparty's promise not to sell a competitor's products.  If the seller/trader is a business operator with a dominant market position, an exclusive sales arrangement may be considered an abusive action under China's Anti-monopoly Law because it restricts the counterparty to conduct transactions only with the dominant market position operator or other businesses that the operator designates. 

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
Data Privacy should not only consider mere Data Protection but also contractual principles. And one of the oldest and most fundamental contractual principles is “do ut des” which is Latin and goes back to ancient Roman Law meaning that there is or should be a certain balance between what you give and what you get in return.


Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

The campaign, codenamed “Fox Hunt 2014”, was launched on July 22, 2014, and is supposed to last for about 180 days.  By July 29 – the 100 days anniversary, the campaign witnessed 180 overseas fugitives arrested (104 of 180) by or surrendering themselves (76 of 180) to the Chinese police.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn


The recent enhanced provisions enacted under the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (“the PDPA”) has provided some clarity as to the standards of compliance expected of organisations that have to transfer personal data collected in Singapore to a country or territory outside Singapore. The basic principle, known as the Transfer Limitation Obligation, prohibits an organisation from transferring any personal data outside of Singapore except in accordance with requirements prescribed under the PDPA. The purpose of such requirements is to “ensure that organisations provide a standard of protection to personal data so transferred that is comparable to the protection under [the PDPA]” (“the Comparable Protection Standard”).



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

On June 6, 2014, the Ministry of Commerce of China issued a new version of Guiding Opinions on the Declaration of Concentration of Undertakings that had been issued previously on January 5, 2009 (the “Guiding Opinions”).  Compared with the old Guiding Opinions, the new Guiding Opinions has some new characteristics.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

On May 29, 2014, State Food and Drug Administration issued "Shi Yao Jian Xie Jian Bian Han [2014] No.51" to seek public comments for the Standards on the Quality Management of Using Medical Devices (Draft for Comment) (“The Standards”). The deadline for comment submission is June 15, 2014. Consisting of eight chapters, the Standards will be the basic requirements for the quality management during the use of medical devices by all entities.  All comments shall be sent to qxjglt@cfda.gov.cn.  You may also contact admin@compliance.com.cn for the submission of your comments.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
PAGE TOTAL 87
6
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8

31010502002477