User Name:     Password:        Join Us
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
▪ Alibaba fined USD 2.68 billion for abusing dominant market position in China
▪ China’s new “Blocking Statute” and the concerns it raised
▪ Survey result: how is bribery risk managed in China?
▪ China’s Administrative Punishment Law awards meaningful credits for compliance eff
▪ Salon | How Would the Sanction on Pompeo and Blocking Measures Impact Foreign Comp
▪ Fees to speakers: academic exchange or commercial bribery
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (2)
▪ China’s Personal Information Protection Law (1)
▪ Reading Into China’s Export Control Law
▪ English Translation of Export Control Law of China
▪ China Issued Its List of Unreliable Entities
▪ Demystify Corporate Social Credit System in China
▪ China is deploying “Operation Skynet” to further “Fox Hunt”
▪ China is to award whistleblowers heavily – foreign companies are more vulnerable t
▪ 130 Chinese headhunters arrested, involving breach of 200 million personal info
▪ Corporate Compliance Programs Evaluation Issued by US DOJ (Chinese Translation)
▪ The prospect is promising to commercialize Level-3 autonomous driving in China
▪ Intelligent and digital infrastructures are scheduled to accompany automatic vehic
▪ Will China illegalize VIEs?
▪ You cannot miss the gold rush under China's new Foreign Investment Law
▪ Classified Protection Under China's Cyber Security Law
▪ China is to fast-track law-making in autonomous driving
▪ What compliance obligations to meet to transfer data from within China?
▪ Chinese government uses digital forensics technology to dig bribery evidence
▪ A Chinese medical device distributor fined CNY 50,000 for bribing with Moutai
▪ How would Chinese E-commerce Law affect you (1)?
▪ Conflict between the culture and the Party’s rules: $70 gift money got a director
▪ "Excessive Pricing" from perspective of Competition Law
▪ Does China prohibit cross-border transfer of scientific data?
▪ Hypermarket Caesar jailed for ten years for giving “reward for go-between”
▪ How is environmental protection tax collected in China?
▪ China Redefined Bribery Anticompetitive in Nature
▪ China is to amend its Constitution
▪ Chinese government vowed to crack down on bribe givers more harshly
▪ China has its own Dodd-Frank; the award for whistleblower could be US$ 80K
▪ Chinese government may LIUZHI a suspect of wrongdoing
▪ Cooking clinical trial data is rampant and now criminally punishable in China
▪ 5th Viadrina Compliance Congress
▪ Does a compliance bird eat nothing?
▪ How Are Drugs Being Sold in China Despite the Anti-Corruption Crusading
▪ Chinese whistle-blower lauded while French boss fled out of China
▪ Life Sentence for Deputy Chief Justice of China
▪ Why Is Chinese Anti-bribery Law a Very Important Compliance Obligation?
▪ The Report on Corporate Compliance Management in China (2016)
▪ Use of "predictive coding" in eDiscovery document review…best friend or job replac
▪ Civil Fraud v. Criminal Fraud: Criminal Proceedings Not a Silver Bullet to Resolve
▪ Corrupt Chinese drug administrators jailed or executed, whose family members ended
▪ Tone from the middle cannot be ignored
▪ Is bribing a Chinese doctor bribing an FCPA governmental official?
▪ Criminal and Administrative Liability under China's Competition Laws
 
Data Privacy should not only consider mere Data Protection but also contractual principles. And one of the oldest and most fundamental contractual principles is “do ut des” which is Latin and goes back to ancient Roman Law meaning that there is or should be a certain balance between what you give and what you get in return.


Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

The campaign, codenamed “Fox Hunt 2014”, was launched on July 22, 2014, and is supposed to last for about 180 days.  By July 29 – the 100 days anniversary, the campaign witnessed 180 overseas fugitives arrested (104 of 180) by or surrendering themselves (76 of 180) to the Chinese police.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn


The recent enhanced provisions enacted under the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (“the PDPA”) has provided some clarity as to the standards of compliance expected of organisations that have to transfer personal data collected in Singapore to a country or territory outside Singapore. The basic principle, known as the Transfer Limitation Obligation, prohibits an organisation from transferring any personal data outside of Singapore except in accordance with requirements prescribed under the PDPA. The purpose of such requirements is to “ensure that organisations provide a standard of protection to personal data so transferred that is comparable to the protection under [the PDPA]” (“the Comparable Protection Standard”).



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

On June 6, 2014, the Ministry of Commerce of China issued a new version of Guiding Opinions on the Declaration of Concentration of Undertakings that had been issued previously on January 5, 2009 (the “Guiding Opinions”).  Compared with the old Guiding Opinions, the new Guiding Opinions has some new characteristics.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

On May 29, 2014, State Food and Drug Administration issued "Shi Yao Jian Xie Jian Bian Han [2014] No.51" to seek public comments for the Standards on the Quality Management of Using Medical Devices (Draft for Comment) (“The Standards”). The deadline for comment submission is June 15, 2014. Consisting of eight chapters, the Standards will be the basic requirements for the quality management during the use of medical devices by all entities.  All comments shall be sent to qxjglt@cfda.gov.cn.  You may also contact admin@compliance.com.cn for the submission of your comments.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

On 24 April 2014, the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress (“NPC”) promulgated the first comprehensive amendment to the Environmental Protection Law (“Amendments”) since the law came into effect nearly 25 years ago. The Amendments consolidate many existing environmental rules and increase the economic and legal liabilities of companies and their management for violation of environmental laws and regulations. The Amendments also call for companies and the government to disclose key environmental protection information.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
On May 14, 2014, Xinhua News Agency reported that Chinese police have concluded a 10-month investigation against GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and uncovered evidence of “large-scale” bribery in Chinese hospitals and other medical institutions, with illegal income amounting to “billions of Chinese yuan.”  GlaxoSmithKline PLC is now the subject of an investigation by the United Kingdom's Serious Fraud Office, the company announced in a statement on May 27, 2014.

Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn

Within a few days the ECJ recently released two game-changing decisions regarding internet providers and their customers: first it accepted that courts may obligate providers to block their customers’ access to internet sites with copyright infringements. And then it declared the European Data Retention Directive to be invalid. This directive committed providers to store traffic and location data of their customers.



Click to read more...
Tweet Like Email LinkedIn
PAGE TOTAL 100
8
The Compliance Reviews COPYRIGHT © 2013-19 All Rights Reserved. Supported by International Risk and Compliance Association and International Risk and Compliance Institute Limited. 沪ICP备10034943号-8

31010502002477